Welcome to DOBO New Energy! Looking for eco-friendly plasticizers (DB series/DINCH/TOTM) to replace DOTP and reduce cost? Chat with us or request a 1kg free sample.
Comprehensive Guide to Primary versus Secondary Plasticizers
Oct 26, 2026
Primary versus secondary plasticizers: compatibility and gelation differences, how changing the balance affects properties and cost, a six-step selection framework and dual-function additives such as ESBO.
Comprehensive Guide to Primary versus Secondary Plasticizers
What separates a primary plasticizer from a secondary one? The dividing line is compatibility and solvating power. A primary plasticizer gels PVC on its own, can be used as the main plasticizing load, and stays in the compound through service life. A secondary plasticizer has limited compatibility, is used together with a primary to extend volume or adjust specific properties, and carries a higher risk of exudation if it is over-used.
The compatibility spectrum
Every plasticizer sits somewhere on a spectrum from fully compatible to incompatible. Compatibility can be judged before compounding through simple observations: whether a dry blend gels into a homogeneous sheet, whether the sheet stays clear, and whether it exudes after storage.
| Behaviour | Primary plasticizer | Secondary plasticizer |
|---|---|---|
| Gels PVC on its own | Yes | Normally no |
| Share of the plasticizer package | Main load | Limited share, with a primary |
| Effect on dry blend time | Sets the gelation rate | Slower on its own |
| Clarity of the compound | Good | Can reduce clarity |
| Risk of exudation | Low if correctly dosed | Higher, dose sensitive |
| Cost per tonne | Reference level | Often lower, used for economy |
What changing the balance actually does to properties
Replacing part of a primary system with a secondary changes more than cost, and the effects are not uniform across properties.
| Property | Direction when secondary share increases | Check |
|---|---|---|
| Compound cost | Lower | Formulation costing |
| Low-temperature flexibility | Usually worse | Cold bend or brittleness test |
| Volatility and ageing | Often worse, since some secondary types are more volatile | Heat ageing and volatile loss test |
| Clarity and surface | Can deteriorate | Visual inspection and surface test |
| Tensile and elongation | Depends on compatibility | Tensile testing |
| Exudation risk | Higher | Storage and humidity cycling |
Some secondary types carry regulatory restrictions in particular markets, so the compliance position has to be checked for the destination market before the formulation is fixed.
A practical selection framework
The framework below is the one that works on the plant floor, because every step ends in a measurement rather than an opinion.
| Step | Question | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | What is the primary duty of the compound? | Sets whether a secondary is relevant at all |
| 2 | Which properties must not move? | Defines the tests that gate the trial |
| 3 | What share can be replaced? | Start with a modest share and step up |
| 4 | Does the compound still gel cleanly? | Dry blend and sheet clarity check |
| 5 | Does it survive ageing? | Heat ageing, cold test, exudation check |
| 6 | Is it compliant in the market? | Confirm the regulatory position |
The role of dual-function additives
Some additives do two jobs at once, and they are often the best answer where a straight secondary plasticizer would hurt performance. Epoxidised soybean oil is the classic example: it acts primarily as a heat-stability co-stabiliser with Ca/Zn systems, and it also contributes a plasticizing effect, which is why its addition is usually offset against the primary plasticizer rather than stacked on top of it.
Frequently asked questions
Can a compound be made with secondary plasticizer only? In principle it can be attempted, but gelation, clarity and exudation behaviour usually make a blend with a primary plasticizer the better engineering choice.
How do I know a plasticizer is a primary? The practical test is whether it gels PVC on its own into a homogeneous, stable sheet; the supplier data package then confirms the intended role.
Does a secondary plasticizer always reduce cost? It often lowers the formulation cost per tonne, but only if the property changes remain acceptable, so the saving is decided after testing, not before.
Where does a dual-function additive fit? It is used on top of a primary system, typically at a few phr, and its plasticizing contribution should be counted in the total plasticizer calculation.
Request a sample and a recommendation
Send us your current formulation and the properties that must not change, and our team will suggest a primary system with, where useful, a secondary or dual-function alternative, supplied as a 1kg complimentary testing sample dispatched worldwide via DHL or FedEx. Trial order MOQ is 1 MT, and bulk shipments are loaded as 23 MT flexitank containers from Ningbo or Shanghai.
Sample and ordering
1kg complimentary testing sample, dispatched worldwide via DHL / FedEx
Trial order MOQ 1 MT (1000L IBC tote or five 200L drums) | Bulk 23 MT flexitank
Request 1kg Free Sample for Testing
Share your grade, application and destination port, and our team will confirm specifications, documentation and sample shipping.
Related technical reading
- Replacing DOTP with DB11 in Flexible PVC Formulations to Reduce Costs by 20%Formulation guidance for evaluating DB11, a non-phthalate plasticizer, as a DOTP replacement in general flexible PVC, including a substitution protocol, cost levers and compliance documentation.
- Eliminating Winter Exudation in PVC Synthetic Leather with DB55Troubleshooting guide to winter exudation in synthetic PVC leather and automotive interiors using DB55: compatibility screening, low-temperature exudation testing and formulation adjustments.
- DB22 Microcellular Foaming Efficiency in PVC Slippers and MatsHow DB22 balances plasticizing and foaming behaviour in PVC microcellular foam for slippers, mats and boards: cell structure control, process windows and a defect checklist.